User Login

Username

Password

Remember me
Forgotten your password?
Home arrow Solutions arrow Client System for Children arrow Mission Statement
Mission Statement Print E-mail
To make Philadelphia a better, safer, more financially responsible city, we will develop and promote pragmatic and concrete measures to enhance participation in society of men and women leaving the Philadelphia Prison System. We intend that these measures will encourage accountability, preserve neighborhood safety and ensure that victims of crime are respected, protected and restored.

Executive Summary

The Problem: They're coming back, whether we like it or not. In a city of 1.5 million people, over 35,000 men, women and youth will go through the Philadelphia Prison System this year and return to our communities. If current trends continue, two-thirds, or almost 23,000 will be rearrested within three years, and over 14,000 will return to jail, having committed new crimes, or parole violations. If we could reduce recidivism rates by only 10%, Philadelphia would save over $6.8 million a year in jail costs alone. In the community, the loss of security and the fear that one could be a victim of crime has a debilitating effect on the quality of life in our city. In addition, the high rate of recidivism speaks volumes about the reentry experience of men, women and youth who, after a period of incarceration, find little hope and even fewer resources to help them change their lives for the better.

The Group:
In March 2002, a diverse group of public and private sector organizations, agencies and individuals met in Philadelphia to address this problem. The group, called the Philadelphia Consensus Group on Reentry & Reintegration of Adjudicated Offenders, was comprised of representatives from the courts and the prison system, the police department and attorneys from Community Legal Services, as well as service providers, and faith-based and community organizations that work in the Philadelphia jails and the community to meet the needs of returning offenders. Our membership also included the unlikely pairing of the District Attorney's Office and the Public Defenders' Association. That this group was able to meet at all was unusual. That we could find common ground on over 40 findings and recommendations for improving the current system is unprecedented. While we have substantial differences on criminal justice issues, what we share is a deep commitment to Philadelphia. Early on, we agreed to a mission statement as an expression of that commitment.

To make Philadelphia a better, safer, more financially responsible city, we will develop and promote pragmatic and concrete measures to enhance participation in society of men and women leaving the Philadelphia Prison System. We intend that these measures will encourage accountability, preserve neighborhood safety and ensure that victims of crime are respected, protected and restored.

The Process: The consensus process was initiated by Search for Common Ground, a Washington D.C.-based conflict resolution organization, at the invitation of former Philadelphia Mayor W. Wilson Goode, Sr.. The process was facilitated by John Good, a Senior Associate of Search for Common Ground, Philadelphia native and seasoned mediator and Marie Williams, a Search for Common Ground Senior Project Manager.

Over the course of a year, we met under agreed-upon consensus ground rules. All parties had the opportunity to participate as equals, regardless of organizational influence or status. All interests and concerns were given equal weight, and ultimately, no proposal was approved without unanimous consent. Our approach was to understand our differences, and work on our commonalities. The preliminary result of this consensus process is a blueprint for action for the community.
 
The Recommendations: In the early stages of the process, we identified over 60 significant barriers to successful reintegration faced by offenders, including poor employment skills, drug addiction, homelessness, lack of positive support systems, and outstanding legal issues. Our recommendations cover a wide range of issues, grouped into five general subjects areas: Personal Responsibility; Pre-release; Legal; Employment, Education & Training; and Community Integration. The findings and recommendations are reflected in the following five general principles:

1. The Philadelphia criminal justice system must rededicate itself to achieving three related goals: public safety, offender accountability and the development of competencies necessary for successful reintegration of offenders into the community. The achievement of better and more coordinated services, including comprehensive pre- and post-release planning, is crucial for offenders in order for them to successfully reintegrate into their communities.

2. The Philadelphia criminal justice system must examine and eliminate legal and administrative barriers that unduly inhibit successful offender reintegration.

3. The Philadelphia criminal justice system must find better ways to coordinate and cooperate.

4. The Philadelphia criminal justice system must engage with members and leaders of the community to assist them in rethinking, and playing a more active role in the reintegration of offenders.

We understand that these principles, and the recommendations that follow, are only a starting point. It will take the commitment of many more partners, including the community, to bring them to fruition. In that process, we will inevitably face our differences once again, but, as we have here, we can maintain our separate convictions, engage in principled and productive dialogue and find solutions that advance the greater good.


< Prev   Next >